>But Mr. Assange has often said that the organization does not always know the identity of its sources. It is highly unlikely that anyone approaching WikiLeaks

>But Mr. Assange has often said that the organization does not always know the identity of its sources. It is highly unlikely that anyone approaching WikiLeaks with the emails obtained by Russian government hacking would acknowledge the source, so it is likely that Mr. Assange cannot be sure of the origin of the emails. I haven't been following this story and don't care enough to have an opinion on which idiot politician is more of an idiot, but one thing does stick out... This isn't journalism. This is an opinion piece. It is, however, being presented as journalism. Wasn't there a word for that?