In the end, it all comes down to Aristotle. We assume that nothing moves unless it is moved by others, and then when faced by the fact that rule necessarily imp

In the end, it all comes down to Aristotle. We assume that nothing moves unless it is moved by others, and then when faced by the fact that rule necessarily implies a infinity chain of movers, we just and put a unmoved mover at the beginning. Because breaking the rule just one is fine.