3 ms·
I'd be interested in how long they've had 68 employees for; was it 68 two years prior to the trial, or even 51? I wonder if there's a balance somewhere here to
by cs02rm0 10y ago
I'd be interested in how long they've had 68 employees for; was it 68 two years prior to the trial, or even 51?
I wonder if there's a balance somewhere here too. Perhaps have employees work 7 hours at a slightly reduced rate.
This trial alone is probably difficult to draw solid conclusions from, other than to say if these employees work less they produce less (albeit not proportionately it seems).