My query is more along the lines of how to invest resources to correct large deviations from the population at large and which deviations are more important tha

My query is more along the lines of how to invest resources to correct large deviations from the population at large and which deviations are more important than others. For example, HMC is attempting to address diversity, but only along gender lines. There is no attempt to address racial diversity in any means. Further in very progressive companies like Google and Facebook, Hispanic and Blacks in leadership positions are less than 1%, compared to a US population of 17% and 12% nationwide (respectively). In these companies, 24% of leadership roles are held by women. That means that with regards to women, they are hitting 48% of their target (if the target is to get a 50/50 gender split). Whereas, with regards to race, they are hitting 5% of their target with Hispanics and 8% with blacks (if the goal is to get close to the population sample at large). So why is that that most "diversity" program only focus on gender? I know that the two aren't mutual exclusive, but it's no secret that far more resources are spent on gender diversity than anything else.