2 ms·
The changes you describe are very different than something like introducing BI and I would expect them to do pretty much what you describe. Prices are very sens
by drabiega 10y ago
The changes you describe are very different than something like introducing BI and I would expect them to do pretty much what you describe. Prices are very sensitive to the distribution of income, so while external capital investment may increase demand for labor and increase agricultural productivity, it also skews production away from agriculture.
This is also the answer to your closing question: Since those who need the basic foodstuffs are financially weak and becoming increasingly so as the proportion of income shifts away from them, the proportion of capacity allocated to producing food for them decreases.
In a UBI scheme, the exact opposite happens. The allocation of income is shifted downwards, so the allocation of production shifts accordingly.
- nashashmi 10y ago> allocation of income is shifted downwards, so the allocation of production shifts accordingly Your explanation makes a lot of sense. It points to the lack of distribution of income as the culprit behind hunger and poverty. But it also narrows the premise in which UBI works: 1) when money is not printed artificially to fulfill UBI, and 2) when financial energy is taken away from more affluent portions of the economy. This seems like adding another element of fragility vulnerable to manipulation in an already complex economic system.