3 ms·
Are you serious? It's definitely possible, and almost simple, to build a limited scale service that is cheaper than S3. S3 has the Amazon footprint behind it, w
by kikoreis 10y ago
Are you serious? It's definitely possible, and almost simple, to build a limited scale service that is cheaper than S3. S3 has the Amazon footprint behind it, which you can't compete against, but the price is not hard to beat.
- matt_wulfeck 10y agoYes, but who will be on call to manage, monitor, and fix it when it breaks? Answer: you! S3 is one of those things that's so cheap and works so well I'd never think of leaving it. If it came down to it, you can lease dx lines from AWS to your datacenter switch and get 10 Gbs to S3 for pretty cheap.
- sroussey 10y agoIt is quite affordable until you have many files / objects.