3 ms·

Ha ha ha he's not though. You dont know what a globalist is. Just being a billionaire doesn't mean he is a globalist. Running a multinational corporation doesn

Ha ha ha he's not though. You dont know what a globalist is. Just being a billionaire doesn't mean he is a globalist. Running a multinational corporation doesn't mean he us a globalist. A globalist is someone who wants to subjugate the sovereignity of individual nation states under the power of a global government, whether overtly (the un) or covertly (bilderbergs/free masons/other conspiracy groups). His whole campaign was about increasing American sovereignity. Perhaps you've heard of his catch phrase, make America great again?

eli_gottlieb 10y ago
>A globalist is someone who wants to subjugate the sovereignity of individual nation states under the power of a global government, whether overtly (the un) or covertly (bilderbergs/free masons/other conspiracy groups). In that case, outside crazy conspiracy websites, there are basically no actual globalists on the planet. Literally zero office-holding politicians have proposed a world government.
- ryanx435 10y ago
  Ha ha I actually agree with you, but it's funny how you immediately dismiss any possibilities for potential condraticting evidence. > outside crazy conspiracy websites You could potentially dismiss any Web source with this standard. What makes a website a crazy conspiracy web site? > basically no actual globalist on the planet The un is literally a globalist organization that nation states voluntarily subjugate their natonal sovereignity to. > literally zero. There is never literally zero of people holding various political beliefs. Anyways, I agree with you, but maybe you should reevaluate your critical thinking skills and base political assumptions.
  - eli_gottlieb 10y ago
    >The un is literally a globalist organization that nation states voluntarily subjugate their natonal sovereignity to. No, it isn't. Every country belonging to the UN is sovereign. The UN has zero legislative power, no enforcement arm, no army or police force. International law is still based on treaties between sovereign countries, not on a global legislature. >There is never literally zero of people holding various political beliefs. I did not say literally zero people. I said literally zero elected officials, which is a much smaller set of people with much more constrained political opinions. At worst, you could find a Green Party city official somewhere who might talk about world government if you get them thoroughly drunk.

eli_gottlieb 10y ago

>A globalist is someone who wants to subjugate the sovereignity of individual nation states under the power of a global government, whether overtly (the un) or covertly (bilderbergs/free masons/other conspiracy groups). In that case, outside crazy conspiracy websites, there are basically no actual globalists on the planet. Literally zero office-holding politicians have proposed a world government.

ryanx435 10y ago
Ha ha I actually agree with you, but it's funny how you immediately dismiss any possibilities for potential condraticting evidence. > outside crazy conspiracy websites You could potentially dismiss any Web source with this standard. What makes a website a crazy conspiracy web site? > basically no actual globalist on the planet The un is literally a globalist organization that nation states voluntarily subjugate their natonal sovereignity to. > literally zero. There is never literally zero of people holding various political beliefs. Anyways, I agree with you, but maybe you should reevaluate your critical thinking skills and base political assumptions.
- eli_gottlieb 10y ago
  >The un is literally a globalist organization that nation states voluntarily subjugate their natonal sovereignity to. No, it isn't. Every country belonging to the UN is sovereign. The UN has zero legislative power, no enforcement arm, no army or police force. International law is still based on treaties between sovereign countries, not on a global legislature. >There is never literally zero of people holding various political beliefs. I did not say literally zero people. I said literally zero elected officials, which is a much smaller set of people with much more constrained political opinions. At worst, you could find a Green Party city official somewhere who might talk about world government if you get them thoroughly drunk.