It sounds like that line is discussing what happens when two (or too many) WiFi users congest a network, not one entity going around intentionally disrupting th

It sounds like that line is discussing what happens when two (or too many) WiFi users congest a network, not one entity going around intentionally disrupting the communications of other devices. It's the difference between not being able to talk to someone because you're in a crowd and not being able to talk to them because someone is standing behind you screaming into your ear. That said, I guess you'd have to see what those specific repeated rulings were and for example whether they were two neighbors bickering over a network or convention centers blocking all WiFi except their own.