4 ms·
You've just identified a form of harassment that is objective, and probably would be agreed upon by the wider community. That's ok because it doesn't rely on a
by marknutter 10y ago
You've just identified a form of harassment that is objective, and probably would be agreed upon by the wider community. That's ok because it doesn't rely on a single person's definition of harassment.
- DanBC 10y agoThere are plenty of people on HN who are horrified by the UK definition of harassment. See, for example, how people react when they read the sentencing remarks or Mr Justice Spencer in Regina vs Joshua Bonehill-Paine https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/sentencing-remarks-of-mr-justice-spencer-r-v-joshua-bonehill-paine-harassment-of-luciana-berger-mp/ https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/sentencing-remarks-of... There are people who'll try to deny that this was antisemitism; that it was actually harassment; that she wasn't harmed by it etc.
- Chris2048 10y ago> See, for example, how people react Where? How do they react?