4 ms·
The OP's point was not "equivalence", it was a "sweet spot". Even with "quite a few different languages", if the standard Emacs modes are close enough to the sw
by tom_mellior 10y ago
The OP's point was not "equivalence", it was a "sweet spot". Even with "quite a few different languages", if the standard Emacs modes are close enough to the sweet spot, you don't need Spacemacs.
- the_duke 10y agoIt's a matter of preference and dedication. Some love bringing their emacs/vim setup to their own perfection and spend a lot of time on it. Other are too lazy for that and are fine with a preconfigured setup like SpaceMacs. Whatever you prefer. My point just was, for someone like me, SpaceMacs is a truly awesome project.