4 ms·
My guess is simply logistical redundancy. If the shipping lanes were impassible for some reason (blockade? ports damaged due to tsunami?), goods could still be
by stock_toaster 10y ago
My guess is simply logistical redundancy. If the shipping lanes were impassible for some reason (blockade? ports damaged due to tsunami?), goods could still be sent/received via rail more cheaply than by air.
Could also be a way to spur growth too. If you need to spend money on something, infrastructure seems like a decent choice.