> Amazes me that people will take the scientific highroad to global warming, but a witchcraft based approach with GMOs. Doesn't seem that amazing when you cons

> Amazes me that people will take the scientific highroad to global warming, but a witchcraft based approach with GMOs. Doesn't seem that amazing when you consider that in both cases people are trying to protect themselves against a perceived threat - the science has little to do with it, other than as a tool. Also, to be fair, most of food science is hardly worthy of the name. We can barely tell what makes a healthy diet in general. How can any scientist worthy of the name say that all GMO's are safe for long term, regular human consumption when they can't even say that about non-GMOs? (see disagreements about whether something as simple as refined sugar or meat should be a regular part of a healthy diet)