> Those 2013 chips cannot properly drive a 4k display. Which honestly seems pretty fair. 4K wasn't mainstream in 2013, you needed to spend a lot of money to bu

> Those 2013 chips cannot properly drive a 4k display. Which honestly seems pretty fair. 4K wasn't mainstream in 2013, you needed to spend a lot of money to buy a 4K display or projector. [0] I wouldn't say that most people purchasing a Mac Mini are planning to use a 4K display with it, considering its target market is people who want to buy a Mac (without an integrated display) but don't want to shell out for a Mac Pro. The Mac Pro not supporting 4K is a problem, one that has been brought up by many other people as an example of how Apple is ignoring the Pro market segment. [0] http://www.alphr.com/news/382774/asus-takes-pre-orders-on-first-4k-monitor-for-3-500 http://www.alphr.com/news/382774/asus-takes-pre-orders-on-fi...