3 ms·

>but I can't imagine that there is a reasonable economic case to be made for it Median net worth of a retiree is $210,000. Many have saved for care in retireme

>but I can't imagine that there is a reasonable economic case to be made for it Median net worth of a retiree is $210,000. Many have saved for care in retirement and therefore will be able to 'demand' it in the market. And I don't believe that includes income from Social Security (which is just a forced savings plan). >It seems to me that what is needed is alternative industries that are booming because they create new economic opportunities in a generative fashion. This is word soup.

metaphorm 10y ago
word soup would be a sentence that doesn't even parse. you're misusing the term in an effort to beat me down with the force of your snark. cut it out. do I actually need to explain it to you? I will anyway, in word sandwiches, since you might prefer that instead of soup. Re-training assembly line workers to be barristas, mall parking lot attendants, and elder-care nurses is not an acceptable outcome. There is increased demand for positions like that in our economy but that is indicative of economic dysfunction, not economic health. Some industries are declining (in terms of labor force participation) because of off-shoring and automation. Those industries are benefiting in profitability from the reduction of their labor costs but the laborers being displaced are not receiving those benefits. New industries that can offer work for displaced laborers are needed. Ideally, those industries are _generative_. That means they are primarily involved in production (of raw materials, of manufactured goods, of energy).
- beguiledfoil 10y ago
  >word soup would be a sentence that doesn't even parse I use it to describe sentences where I can jumble up all the adjectives and get the same meaning - a meaning which is so vague that people can just interpret the sentence as something that conveniently agrees with their prior convictions >Ideally, those industries are _generative_. That means they are primarily involved in production (of raw materials, of manufactured goods, of energy). Your prior conviction is that new stuff is needed and intrinsically good. I am not so bold as to hold such a conviction. Maybe people simply need to be enabled to do more with less.

metaphorm 10y ago

word soup would be a sentence that doesn't even parse. you're misusing the term in an effort to beat me down with the force of your snark. cut it out. do I actually need to explain it to you? I will anyway, in word sandwiches, since you might prefer that instead of soup. Re-training assembly line workers to be barristas, mall parking lot attendants, and elder-care nurses is not an acceptable outcome. There is increased demand for positions like that in our economy but that is indicative of economic dysfunction, not economic health. Some industries are declining (in terms of labor force participation) because of off-shoring and automation. Those industries are benefiting in profitability from the reduction of their labor costs but the laborers being displaced are not receiving those benefits. New industries that can offer work for displaced laborers are needed. Ideally, those industries are _generative_. That means they are primarily involved in production (of raw materials, of manufactured goods, of energy).

beguiledfoil 10y ago
>word soup would be a sentence that doesn't even parse I use it to describe sentences where I can jumble up all the adjectives and get the same meaning - a meaning which is so vague that people can just interpret the sentence as something that conveniently agrees with their prior convictions >Ideally, those industries are _generative_. That means they are primarily involved in production (of raw materials, of manufactured goods, of energy). Your prior conviction is that new stuff is needed and intrinsically good. I am not so bold as to hold such a conviction. Maybe people simply need to be enabled to do more with less.