4 ms·

A literal challenge (i.e. competition) you may choose to face, is of course the Loebner prize. Held in Bletchley Park due to its history with Alan Turing. If y

A literal challenge (i.e. competition) you may choose to face, is of course the Loebner prize. Held in Bletchley Park due to its history with Alan Turing. If your chatbot can be more convincing than three other finalist chatbots over four half hour dual-conversations (a human judge conversing simultaneously with one chatbot and one confederate human, but is not told which is which) then you stand to win a solid bronze medal and $4000 ($1500, $1000 and $500 to the runners-up). A silver medal and $25,000 goes to any chatbot which fools half the judges. To get $100,000 and a solid gold silver medal, you'll need to make a chatbot that is indistinguisable from a human over video chat, now that's a proper challenge!

gspetr 10y ago
> you'll need to make a chatbot that is indistinguisable from a human over video chat This may sound cynical, but if you could arrange a tableau, looking like someone is paralyzed in a hospital environment, speaking like Stephen Hawking, then you don't need any serious advances in robotics (IIRC uncanny valley still hasn't been crossed) to fool humans. But I imagine the rules won't allow that.
- Coincoin 10y ago
  Don't forget you are directly competing against a human. If you are a judge, which one would you chose? The still frame with a robot voice pretending to be Hawking or the actual human?
- AndrewOMartin 10y ago
  This is a good point, and arguably a weakness in the Turing test, the headline grabbing Eugene Goostman chatbot's limited success was from a similar "social engineering" style technique, of tying slowly, changing the subject, telling its own stories and claiming to be a distracted teenager with poor English. In response to the comment by Coincoin, each judge gets to pick "Human, Computer, Not Sure" for both participants, so they're at liberty to respond "Human, Human". It's true that the "real" human might make someone more likely to declare the "fake tableau" a chatbot, but the perceived disability might also make them less likely to risk declaring them a computer.

gspetr 10y ago

> you'll need to make a chatbot that is indistinguisable from a human over video chat This may sound cynical, but if you could arrange a tableau, looking like someone is paralyzed in a hospital environment, speaking like Stephen Hawking, then you don't need any serious advances in robotics (IIRC uncanny valley still hasn't been crossed) to fool humans. But I imagine the rules won't allow that.

Coincoin 10y ago
Don't forget you are directly competing against a human. If you are a judge, which one would you chose? The still frame with a robot voice pretending to be Hawking or the actual human?
AndrewOMartin 10y ago
This is a good point, and arguably a weakness in the Turing test, the headline grabbing Eugene Goostman chatbot's limited success was from a similar "social engineering" style technique, of tying slowly, changing the subject, telling its own stories and claiming to be a distracted teenager with poor English. In response to the comment by Coincoin, each judge gets to pick "Human, Computer, Not Sure" for both participants, so they're at liberty to respond "Human, Human". It's true that the "real" human might make someone more likely to declare the "fake tableau" a chatbot, but the perceived disability might also make them less likely to risk declaring them a computer.