3 ms·
Probably because their savings were still insufficient for their needs, because they didn't get paid enough during their working years. I'm not claiming that S
by smallnamespace 10y ago
Probably because their savings were still insufficient for their needs, because they didn't get paid enough during their working years.
I'm not claiming that Singapore's system solves all edge cases (no system can), just that the current scheme seems like a sane, rational compromise between total or zero freedom.