3 ms·
The flaw in your proposal is that the problem here really isn't a technical one. Your argument seems to be "once you can export your connections that solves al
by TomOfTTB 16y ago
The flaw in your proposal is that the problem here really isn't a technical one. Your argument seems to be "once you can export your connections that solves all other problems because companies will have to listen to you". But that's not true.
Right now you could easily create an export system using the e-mail addresses of your connections. But once you do that you can't interact with Facebook members.
That's the problem with Facebook and it's root is in a business reality not a technical issue. Facebook and other social networks realize they lose their greatest (and maybe only) customer retaining mechanism if they become inter-operable. Once that happens they become a cheap commodity (much like e-mail servers are today).
So becoming inter-operable means the end of companies like Facebook being major players in the industry and they aren't going to do that willingly. THAT is the problem.
- arethuza 16y agoThat is true, but I'm pretty sure back in the old days there were multiple proprietary email systems that didn't interoperate and they eventually all did end up supporting SMTP eventually.
- Raphael 16y agoAh, but the other networks risk a fate much worse than commodity if they don't band together. Notice the widespread adoption of OpenSocial, including MySpace, Hi5, and Ning.