> To me it does. How do you know? We don't even know if it's a they a him or her. It would be fallacious to reason about the soundness of bitcoin based on the

> To me it does. How do you know? We don't even know if it's a they a him or her. It would be fallacious to reason about the soundness of bitcoin based on the person who created it anyway, given that you are not being asked to trust it based on reputation - they are many better sources of information to use when making a decision about the soundness of the currency. > I understand the blockchain concept but still we can't accept it as infallible. No one is saying to accept it as infallible, and in fact not knowing who created it helps with that sort of thing, given that you have to actually evaluate it for what it is instead of just saying, "Well, X created it and I love everything else they've done."