3 ms·
Looking into the culture from afar, it does appear to be more than just the repercussions of 'red scare' tactics. The impression I get is that in some parts of
by ZenoArrow 10y ago
Looking into the culture from afar, it does appear to be more than just the repercussions of 'red scare' tactics.
The impression I get is that in some parts of the country there's a general distrust in government, alongside a trust in entrepreneurship. Neither of which seems stupid to me.
I'd also say that government spending is an easier sell in metropolitan areas as public investments in cities make a bigger impact on quality of life. Public transport is a good example of this, if I was in a rural setting I wouldn't expect much in the way of public transport spending, but I'd expect it in a city.
However, whilst it's healthy not to trust in government too much, the same is true of trusting big business to act in your interest. Government should act to keep companies in line with public interest. Whether that involves big government or not is debatable, but I don't think it'd be a good idea to have any one single company that had larger influence on the general population than the government does.
- coldtea 10y ago>Looking into the culture from afar, it does appear to be more than just the repercussions of 'red scare' tactics. Then again, the US had one of the most progressive and vibrant worker rights and union movements in the world (fighting for child labor, the 8 hour week, women's work, immigrant rights, etc) -- until about the 2nd World War and the Red Scare.