3 ms·
What's with the blatant ignoring of Opera here? It shows up in the article's source link's market share, but in none of the performance comparisons. This line
by endtime 17y ago
What's with the blatant ignoring of Opera here? It shows up in the article's source link's market share, but in none of the performance comparisons. This line is particularly egregious:
>Chrome 4, which remains the fastest (stable) JavaScript browser currently available.
Chrome does beat Opera on V8 (which isn't surprising, since Google created V8), but on Sunspider, well...
>The SunSpider test took just 345.6 ms on our quad-core test system, compared to 387.8 ms of Chrome 5.0.342.8.
And here are my results in Opera 10.53, using a machine that's over a year old (AMD Phenom II X4 940, factory settings):
Total: 302.8ms +/- 2.1%
Edit: Removed full results because it made my comment too long, but if anyone's actually curious for more detail I'm happy to run it again.
- pieter 17y agoyou really can't compare your timing results with theirs, as you don't have the same machine. Run the same test on your machine with Chrome 4 and 5 and then compare those.