3 ms·
maybe when community and development speed and extensibility are the main requirements it all leads back to Jekyll :/ if I would be a ruby guy it would be defin
by therealmarv 10y ago
maybe when community and development speed and extensibility are the main requirements it all leads back to Jekyll :/ if I would be a ruby guy it would be definitely my first choice.
Hugo is the speedy gonzales with easy deployment but lacks good extensibility when you want to go into the code level :(
- StavrosK 10y agoI think you're right... Bah, just when I was convinced by Hugo, you convinced me to use Lektor again :P
- therealmarv 10y agosorry :D it really depends on your requirements. If Hugo in its current state covers you or if you can live with a light toolchain around Hugo go Hugo (I think many people do not need to touch the go code). There is nobody saying that you cannot write a little python code which is run before/after hugo (actually some people are doing that!). But if you want total control/extensibility with your python code in the page generator the Lektor plugin system will give you more power.
- StavrosK 10y agoI decided to go with Lektor in the end, since it's much easier to work with and good enough for my purposes for now. Plus, since I'm a Python dev, I can extend it much more easily.