7 ms·

The trouble was that What.CD wasn't a loss for anyone who didn't have the patience to sit through an examination to be allowed to look at the site. http://rock

The trouble was that What.CD wasn't a loss for anyone who didn't have the patience to sit through an examination to be allowed to look at the site. http://rocknerd.co.uk/2016/11/19/what-the-death-of-what-cd-failed-to-mean-for-all-of-humanity/ http://rocknerd.co.uk/2016/11/19/what-the-death-of-what-cd-f... tl;dr the way to preserve culture for all of humanity is to make lots of copies.

webmaven 10y ago
TL/DR: "Lots Of Copies Keep Stuff Safe."
cryptarch 10y ago
It's an examination over IRC, so yes, you'd have to have your second laptop on idle next to you for 4 hours, but if you're not staring at the chatroom all the time its not much of a chore. There also was a site called "What.CD Interview Prep" with all the knowledge you were supposed to have before joining, e.g. about lossy and lossless encoding and "The Golden Rules". I'm sure no one ever had that open on a second computer, or just closed it for a sec when making the screenshot proof.
- davidgerard 10y ago
  I’m hard pressed to see how this isn’t a description of a resource sabotaged by its own snobbery. Completely artificial scarcity is not an effective gain for all of humanity, rather than a vanishingly tiny part of it, and now zero. You do realise the attitude you're defending is why What.CD has completely failed to preserve culture.
  - cryptarch 10y ago
    While I do agree it would have been nice if they had released a torrent with all torrent files on their site, I also think they did a very good job overall. Their users might have dispersed, but the content is still out there and the good sharing habits will stick with the ex-members. It has also caused many, many CD's to be ripped, curated and massively distributed to very high standards, for years. The curated metadata and social structure might have been lost, but the content survives. I think they were mostly sabotaged by lack of anonimization and by their centralized architecture.

webmaven 10y ago

TL/DR: "Lots Of Copies Keep Stuff Safe."

cryptarch 10y ago

It's an examination over IRC, so yes, you'd have to have your second laptop on idle next to you for 4 hours, but if you're not staring at the chatroom all the time its not much of a chore. There also was a site called "What.CD Interview Prep" with all the knowledge you were supposed to have before joining, e.g. about lossy and lossless encoding and "The Golden Rules". I'm sure no one ever had that open on a second computer, or just closed it for a sec when making the screenshot proof.

davidgerard 10y ago
I’m hard pressed to see how this isn’t a description of a resource sabotaged by its own snobbery. Completely artificial scarcity is not an effective gain for all of humanity, rather than a vanishingly tiny part of it, and now zero. You do realise the attitude you're defending is why What.CD has completely failed to preserve culture.
- cryptarch 10y ago
  While I do agree it would have been nice if they had released a torrent with all torrent files on their site, I also think they did a very good job overall. Their users might have dispersed, but the content is still out there and the good sharing habits will stick with the ex-members. It has also caused many, many CD's to be ripped, curated and massively distributed to very high standards, for years. The curated metadata and social structure might have been lost, but the content survives. I think they were mostly sabotaged by lack of anonimization and by their centralized architecture.