4 ms·
What makes you say it's been neglected? I scrolled back until i got tired (~3 years) of github's history page for the editor/ directory and it looks like a stea
by zurn 10y ago
What makes you say it's been neglected? I scrolled back until i got tired (~3 years) of github's history page for the editor/ directory and it looks like a steady and active stream of development: https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/commits/dev/editor/js https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/commits/dev/editor/js
- rl3 10y agoIts commit history represents a small fraction of overall commits on the project. While the editor can surely be considered under active development by normal standards, a Mr. Doob project raises the bar on that. It's not uncommon to see him average over a dozen commits a day on a regular basis for the entire three.js repo, in addition to managing and merging a ton of pull requests at the same time. That said, I agree saying it's neglected is a bit unfair, so I've reworded my original statement qualifying it as sort of neglected (far more diplomatic). Moreover, it isn't really fair for me to hold it to the same standards as production-grade editors, since I'm pretty sure its primary purpose is to simply give people a sandbox environment to play around in. You'll be happy to know GitHub rate limited me around January 2015 of the commit history you linked, since there was so much of it. :)