4 ms·
I recall doing a proof of the form: 1. Prove the triangle inequality, & extend via induction to show that [A] a straight line is the shortest polygonal path, a
by systoll 10y ago
I recall doing a proof of the form:
1. Prove the triangle inequality, & extend via induction to show that [A] a straight line is the shortest polygonal path, and that [B] adding a point to a polygonal path can only make it longer.
2. Arc length is defined as the limit of the length of a polygonal approximations to a curve. From (B), we know our approximations would approach the arc length from below.
So if an curve A->B has an arc length, there's a polygon A->B which is at least as short. And from [A] we know there's no polygon shorter than the straight line.
This is weaker than proofs you can do with calculus -- it doesn't prove uniqueness, and it completely ignores non-rectifiable curves, for instance. But I suspect that's what ams6110 is remembering.
- wfunction 10y ago2. Arc length is defined as the limit of the length of a polygonal approximations to a curve. From (B), we know our approximations would approach the arc length from below. You call this "geometry"? Since when does geometry involve a function limiting and bounding process? We didn't even know what a limit was until calculus...