It's interesting since I proposed using LLVM in place of inline assembly a while back. I got this counter point when I asked on ESR's blog: http://lists.llvm.o

It's interesting since I proposed using LLVM in place of inline assembly a while back. I got this counter point when I asked on ESR's blog: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2011-October/043724.html http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2011-October/043724... Any LLVM experts have thoughts on this or my original goal within the context of LLVM's current situation?