4 ms·
Yes 18159 does fit the definition of a natural number. But OEIS only contains the first few terms of every sequence. So I'm technically correct that it isn't in
by Houshalter 10y ago
Yes 18159 does fit the definition of a natural number. But OEIS only contains the first few terms of every sequence. So I'm technically correct that it isn't in OEIS. And I would argue that being the 10k+ term in a sequence doesn't qualify as interesting.