3 ms·
> If you look at Google's cached version, you can see that the JS is executed Correct me if I am wrong but when I look at the cached version of the homepage (h
by gildas 10y ago
> If you look at Google's cached version, you can see that the JS is executed
Correct me if I am wrong but when I look at the cached version of the homepage (http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:hN5yCkyIyzkJ:https://hyperthemes.matthi.coffee/&num=1&hl=en&gl=fr&strip=0&vwsrc=1 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:hN5yCky...), I don't see that the JS has been interpreted.
- matt4077 10y agoThe "Network error" in the top left is a JS result. Also, since you linked to the source view, you'll see that there actually isn't anything in the body but the script being loaded, whereas "Full version" shows the user interface was correctly initialised.
- gildas 10y agoDisable JavaScript in your browser when viewing the cached page. All you will see is an empty page.
- matt4077 10y agoNow I'm feeling a bit stupid, will slowly walk away and hope I can get by with "it's Jan 1st and I didn't get much sleep" as an excuse...
- j_s 10y agoFirst, thank you for taking the time to stick your neck out a bit and share an example. Second, thank you for responding to someone pointing out that you were wrong without putting yourself on the defensive. I see this entire sub-thread as a positive; glad we all could learn along with you!