4 ms·
It's not their duty to regulate the private dietary choices of every individual.
by gragas 10y ago
It's not their duty to regulate the private dietary choices of every individual.
- brianwawok 10y agoBut they aren't. They are giving a bonus to people that make good choices. Seems good to me. Disclaimer: makes good choices and am health nut.
- gns24 10y agoWhy do you think other people don't make the same good choices?
- brianwawok 10y agoI am at Walmart right now. I looked around. Other Americans do not make the same good choices I make.
- gns24 10y agoOkay, my question could be interpreted that way. My intended question was "Other Americans don't make the same good choices; why do you think that is?"
- tinbucket 10y agoI agree with that, but it's also not their duty to supply easy access to shitty unhealthy food either.
- chrisseaton 10y agoI don't think anyone in this thread argued that it was their duty to do anything. Everything we've talked about employers doing in this thread has been optional for the the employer. So you haven't said anything that anyone appears to disagree with. But I wouldn't say it was regulating. Can you see a difference between being allowed to eat and drink whatever you want, and requiring that your employer provide whatever you want to eat and drink? If your local shop doesn't happen to sell your favourite drink they aren't regulating you are they? That's just not what that word means.