2 ms·
For their web client, the encryption is really only useful as long as you can guarantee that the JavaScript code has not been tampered with. Once a court orders
by pfg 10y ago
For their web client, the encryption is really only useful as long as you can guarantee that the JavaScript code has not been tampered with. Once a court orders them to hand over the private key of their TLS certificates (as has happened in the Lavabit case), it's game over for anyone able to man-in-the-middle the connection to Protonmail, or for anyone who's able to compromise their web server directly. It really isn't any better than Lavabit if exposed to that threat model.
- jimnotgym 10y agoThe only added defense they have here is jurisdiction. It would be unconstitutional for a court in Switzerland to order them to hand over their private key, wouldn't it?