4 ms·

I don't know why OP is being down voted. Kim Dotcom tweeted he had early access to the leaks. It feels like a more plausible theory to me than the one the Obama

I don't know why OP is being down voted. Kim Dotcom tweeted he had early access to the leaks. It feels like a more plausible theory to me than the one the Obama administration is pushing. He announced his attention to be "an Internet Freedom fighter" and "Hillary's worse nightmare in 2016" back in 2014. Look at this tweet from 10 hours ago: "My old hacker firm Data Protect hacked 100% of its clients." https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/815373371001028608 https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/815373371001028608 Another tweet from a few days ago claiming: "I know with 100% certainty that @Russia & @PutinRF_Eng had nothing to do with Clinton related election hacks!" https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/814593453963083776 https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/814593453963083776 It surely seems like Kim Dotcom wants people to think he is involved.

wcummings 10y ago
He's just a washed up loser looking for attention, like McAfee.
- Natsu 10y ago
  That is, indeed, quite probable. But he did predict that Wikileaks would be a problem for her. That's non-specific enough that he could've been lucky. But as long as we're wondering who might've leaked what, you have to admit that he's at least suspicious. He has had a longstanding grudge against them and I can totally imagine him hiring some hacker group.
Natsu 10y ago
There's always heavy downvoting in these threads. Look for interesting discussion to upvote to counter. Thanks for those tweets, yes, he has done a lot of things that make him at least suspicious. I wouldn't take him seriously at all if not for the fact that he predicted some of this. Incidentally, for those mentioning McAfee, I see no reason to take that guy seriously, nor am I presently aware of him displaying any foreknowledge of any of this.

4 ms·

I don't know why OP is being down voted. Kim Dotcom tweeted he had early access to the leaks. It feels like a more plausible theory to me than the one the Obama

by shimon_e 10y ago

wcummings 10y ago
He's just a washed up loser looking for attention, like McAfee.
- Natsu 10y ago
  That is, indeed, quite probable. But he did predict that Wikileaks would be a problem for her. That's non-specific enough that he could've been lucky. But as long as we're wondering who might've leaked what, you have to admit that he's at least suspicious. He has had a longstanding grudge against them and I can totally imagine him hiring some hacker group.
Natsu 10y ago
There's always heavy downvoting in these threads. Look for interesting discussion to upvote to counter. Thanks for those tweets, yes, he has done a lot of things that make him at least suspicious. I wouldn't take him seriously at all if not for the fact that he predicted some of this. Incidentally, for those mentioning McAfee, I see no reason to take that guy seriously, nor am I presently aware of him displaying any foreknowledge of any of this.