4 ms·
No, you fail to understand the author's comment and then instead of asking whether you were understanding something correctly, you've jumped to conclusions and
by waterphone 10y ago
No, you fail to understand the author's comment and then instead of asking whether you were understanding something correctly, you've jumped to conclusions and started attacking the author as a fraud and a spammer instead of recognizing that the summary here was written a little vaguely in a way that you interpreted as the author claiming to have identified who the attackers were, rather than the creators of the malware.
- dimino 10y agoI didn't fail to understand anything, the author was intentionally misleading/wrong in his comment so he can hop on the "but we don't KNOW" bandwagon, like every climate denier and anti-vaxxer does.
- waterphone 10y agoI have no idea what you're talking about. You've twisted subtle phrasing in a comment into an absurd conspiracy.