4 ms·
The National Health Service? That's communism, silly. And communism is bad. More seriously, the American people just don't trust their government to be compete
by canadian_voter 10y ago
The National Health Service? That's communism, silly. And communism is bad.
More seriously, the American people just don't trust their government to be competent or efficient. Only about 20% describe government programs as "well-run."[0] Although more than 50% seem to think that it's doing an okay job on health care at the moment.
It would be an incredible undertaking to establish something like the NHS in the US, and the political will just isn't there.
[0] http://www.people-press.org/2015/11/23/beyond-distrust-how-americans-view-their-government/ http://www.people-press.org/2015/11/23/beyond-distrust-how-a...
- keithpeter 10y agoThe NHS is actually organised as a large number of locally managed nodes. Doctor's practices (GPs) are self-governing to some extent, and hospitals are managed by trusts. There has been a lot of reorganisation recently (the Tories always reorganise the NHS, it is a thing they do). My knowledge of the US is limited but I imagine that a US version of the NHS would be organised by state and then by district hospitals. Plenty of moving parts at the back end but at least the patient just sees the single payer front end.
- afarrell 10y agoAlso there are commissioning groups? I also want to look into how the NHS works in more detail.
- keithpeter 10y agoThere are and I'm hazy about how it all fits together. Might do some googling once I've rested up today (we saw the New Year in last night)
- afarrell 10y agoRight, my feeling is that democrats, by failing to pay attention to the effectiveness of the VA, are shooting themselves in the foot. But maybe I'm wrong and the issue has complexities I'm not yet aware of.