5 ms·
This is to protect the weaker part of the equation, the employee so that the employer can not force you to do it, anyway i always thought that configure the wor
by ghostDancer 10y ago
This is to protect the weaker part of the equation, the employee so that the employer can not force you to do it, anyway i always thought that configure the work email in your phone or home computer is apart from stupid a security and privacy risk.
- minipci1321 10y ago> his is to protect the weaker part of the equation, the employee Presumably you are in hi-tech industry -- software, hardware etc? These employees have never been weak part of the equation (not even in France ;-), since I can remember, as far back as 1997. One could always slam the door, cross the street and get a better job. > i always thought that configure the work email in your phone or home computer is apart from stupid a security and privacy risk. Agree! But what if the employer have given you the mobile phone you use, and pays the subscription fee?
- ghostDancer 10y agoIf he gives me a phone , then i should have another one for my private use, never ever mix both of them, unless you are the owner then do whatever you want. Even if he pays the phone and fee , he should pay me for answering out of hours, i think we can all agree that is not the same to answer a phone call during my work hours at 09:00 or when i'm at home with my family sleeping at 03:00 , if i'm that needed and indispensable, show me the money! And not, i'm not on the hi-tech industry , but the worker is always the weaker link, look how many workers are fucked up the bosses and how many owners are fucked up by their employees.
- eeZah7Ux 10y ago> One could always slam the door, cross the street and get a better job Or a worse one. Otherwise companies would be offering infinite benefits and salary and reject zero candidates. Look up salaries in France compared to norther Europe or US.