> It's funny, I find Snowden very very credible, but > Assange I find not-in-the-least credible. That's a shame. Assange has earned your trust by never,

> It's funny, I find Snowden very very credible, but > Assange I find not-in-the-least credible. That's a shame. Assange has earned your trust by never, once, being shown to have provided incorrect information. If you can cite a single instance where his information was not correct, I am very interested. Until then, he's gone through more hell even then Snowden with nobody able to dispute his releases. What more could he possibly do to earn your trust?