4 ms·

> he is unhappy that some dirty laundry > on Hillary was released to the voters Even the Ecuadorians were pretty pissed off about it[0], and they seem to h

> he is unhappy that some dirty laundry > on Hillary was released to the voters Even the Ecuadorians were pretty pissed off about it[0], and they seem to have no problem giving the US the finger > even after Assange ... have assured us It's funny, I find Snowden very very credible, but Assange I find not-in-the-least credible. Also I can't find a source for this, just "an associate of" Assange -- this[1] is the best source I could find, and it's ... weird. > You should be unhappy that Obama has > been sabre rattling against Russia > for years Hrm[2]. [0] http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6f997f97c5f140a29f385ea05f1b642c/wikileaks-assanges-internet-link-severed-state-actor http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6f997f97c5f140a29f385ea05f1b6... [1] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-a... [2] http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/oct/22/barack-obama/obama-romney-called-russia-our-top-geopolitical-fo/ http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/oct/...

pdx 10y ago
> It's funny, I find Snowden very very credible, but > Assange I find not-in-the-least credible. That's a shame. Assange has earned your trust by never, once, being shown to have provided incorrect information. If you can cite a single instance where his information was not correct, I am very interested. Until then, he's gone through more hell even then Snowden with nobody able to dispute his releases. What more could he possibly do to earn your trust?
- peteretep 10y ago
  > Assange has earned your trust > by never, once, being shown to > have provided incorrect > information I suspect what you mean is "Wikileaks has apparently never released forged documents", which is very very different from "Assange has never provided incorrect information".

pdx 10y ago

> It's funny, I find Snowden very very credible, but > Assange I find not-in-the-least credible. That's a shame. Assange has earned your trust by never, once, being shown to have provided incorrect information. If you can cite a single instance where his information was not correct, I am very interested. Until then, he's gone through more hell even then Snowden with nobody able to dispute his releases. What more could he possibly do to earn your trust?

peteretep 10y ago
> Assange has earned your trust > by never, once, being shown to > have provided incorrect > information I suspect what you mean is "Wikileaks has apparently never released forged documents", which is very very different from "Assange has never provided incorrect information".