3 ms·
Largely a rehash of all the other discussions on the subject. No, it doesn't provide much new evidence, but also some claim that it wasn't really supposed to.
by losvedir 10y ago
Largely a rehash of all the other discussions on the subject. No, it doesn't provide much new evidence, but also some claim that it wasn't really supposed to.
Anyway, one particular component I'm curious about, is the new list of IP addresses that were released[0]. I've been following the story only somewhat closely, but I believe that was genuinely new evidence that came out. Is there a public DB somewhere that lists what we know of IP addresses and their known malware activity? Some other post on HN mentioned that "30+%" of them were simply Tor endpoints and VPSs/VPNs, which obviously don't say very much. But I don't really know of a way to get a feel for how interesting this new data the government released is, or if that 30% claim is accurate.
[0] https://www.us-cert.gov/security-publications/GRIZZLY-STEPPE-Russian-Malicious-Cyber-Activity https://www.us-cert.gov/security-publications/GRIZZLY-STEPPE...