3 ms·
>or even something illegal. (It is the lack of security that results in break-ins, that should.) Wat Does this mean stealing from people's houses is not only
by akhilcacharya 10y ago
>or even something illegal. (It is the lack of security that results in break-ins, that should.)
Wat
Does this mean stealing from people's houses is not only legal if they don't have "proper security", but that the victim should be punished instead?
- prostoalex 10y agoI think he implies that once you get into the area of international law, what's "illegal" for one party is merely "protecting and advancing national interests" for another. Moreover, there's no universally accepted third-party authority in charge of decision-making (i.e. your local courts) and enforcement (i.e. your local cops) that any country can appeal to in order to rule something "illegal". And even if there was, it's all based on a system of international agreements, so what's to prevent the aggressor from exiting the treaty anyways?