3 ms·
No, he was saying that whether or not there is a God is either a true or false statement. Now of course, whether or not we can determine the truth of that stat
by timwiseman 16y ago
No, he was saying that whether or not there is a God is either a true or false statement.
Now of course, whether or not we can determine the truth of that statement is another question entirely. I certainly am not aware of any way of proving it either way in this life, and indeed the evidence I am aware of (in either direction) is highly ambigious. And of course, even if you decide you personally beleive there is a God (or a multitude of them) that does not indicate which (if any!) of the currently available religions is closest to correct.
I arrived at my decision to believe in Christianity by a leap of faith. I think there is some evidence I can bring to bear to support it, but I am the first to admit that it would not stand up in most courts of law much less in the arena of science. I believe it because on an intuitive emotional level, it seems right.
Thus, I try to respect all religious beliefs. I cannot prove my beliefs are correct. I cannot disprove someone else's beliefs (excluding a very few fringe groups that make provably false claims, and even then it is those specific claims not the religion as a whole I could disprove).
But, while my belief in God is a personal thing, the existence or nonexistence of God is a fact. We may not be able to answer the question in this mortal life, but it is still either true or false.
- ErrantX 16y agoI think we're actually agreeing. My point was the existence/non-existence of God as a fact is currently unprovable. And, so, either viewpoint is essentially the same - just in reverse.