3 ms·
Some good examples there, but in all it's rather brief. Surely there's more to jQuery 1.4? I'm getting quite weary of hearing that this or that is HTML5, and t
by julio_the_squid 16y ago
Some good examples there, but in all it's rather brief. Surely there's more to jQuery 1.4?
I'm getting quite weary of hearing that this or that is HTML5, and then you view it and there's really nothing in particular that you couldn't do with HTML 4.1. Is there something special and brand new about showing a set of slides with Javascript with a poor interface? With all of this hype and mislabeling, average semi-technical people are becoming confused from here to Zaire about HTML5. The comments on say, TechCrunch prove this thoroughly every time the topic is mentioned.
- mbrubeck 16y agoInterestingly it does use "section" and "header" elements, which are basically invisible to users but are also among the few "HTML5" features that actually fit the name.
- julio_the_squid 16y agoYeah, I saw it uses a few new elements. Still, you could accomplish the same effect without them, right? So it doesn't really require HTML5?