5 ms·
That was what we had in mind! I guess instead of saying we're trying to be "less biased", we should be focusing on "what both left and right-wing leaning news a
by awgme 10y ago
That was what we had in mind! I guess instead of saying we're trying to be "less biased", we should be focusing on "what both left and right-wing leaning news are saying", as long as the information is correct.
- brudgers 10y agoCurious what would be considered left leaning and right leaning and whether or not an "equal time" approach might reflect a bias.
- codeddesign 10y agoCorrect...The only way around this that I see would be to allow voting in which the crowd would decide if the article would be in the correct column or not.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- joeclark77 10y agoThe problem with that is that in most cases, one of the two of you will be more talented and get more traffic, resulting in the other guy getting flamed by commenters, etc. For example Sean Hannity's show used to be "Hannity and Colmes", one right-wing and one left-wing commentator, and poor Mr. Colmes was just outnumbered and outgunned to the point that he quit.
- bryanrasmussen 10y agoIt might achieve some popularity but the difficulty of determining correctness or bias or other things without bringing your own bias to the problem will of course mean that the stated goal is not what will actually be the end result.