> For example, I doubt your subseq works on strings (or bytestrings) Your view of Common Lisp seems to be created more by assumptions and not so by actual real

> For example, I doubt your subseq works on strings (or bytestrings) Your view of Common Lisp seems to be created more by assumptions and not so by actual real limitations. Strings: CL-USER 10 > (subseq "xxfoobarxx" 2 8) "foobar" Any vector: CL-USER 11 > (subseq #(10 30 20 100 50 30 20 20) 2 8) #(20 100 50 30 20 20) Bitvector: CL-USER 12 > (subseq #*10101010010101001010101 2 8) #*101010