4 ms·
Are you advocating that no one be held responsible? Of course things can be complicated, but in light of the evidence, it isn't as hard to disentangle as you su
by noobermin 10y ago
Are you advocating that no one be held responsible? Of course things can be complicated, but in light of the evidence, it isn't as hard to disentangle as you suggest.
- maxerickson 10y agoNot at all. In a case like Flint there will be people with clear culpability for the poor decisions that were made. But there are millions of lead service lines elsewhere in the US (the pipes from the street to the house). Who's "responsible" for them?
- pessimizer 10y agoWouldn't the answer to this question depend on which pipes you're talking about? Are you arguing that Flint is the only place where lead had a cause?
- tedunangst 10y agoKind of amazing that somebody twice asks "who's responsible?" and instead of an answer to a straightforward question, they're accused of claiming nobody is responsible. Why not just answer the question?
- JumpCrisscross 10y ago> a straightforward question It's not a question with an objective, simple and thus straightforward answer.
- tedunangst 10y agoAll the more reason not to attack the person asking it.