5 ms·

Donna Brazille and DWS were respectively fired from CNN and resigned over the corruption.

by fleitz 10y ago

lern_too_spel 10y ago
Donna Brazille wasn't DNC chair until after the primaries were over, so how would she be an example of the DNC rigging the primaries for Clinton? Wasserman-Schultz resigned to get out of the spotlight, which she believed would put more attention on Clinton for the general election. We have the DNC's full email history here. Surely if they rigged the primary for Clinton, there would be at least one email showing it.
- astronautjones 10y ago
  Donna Brazille was fired for leaking debate questions to the HRC campaign
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
  - lern_too_spel 10y ago
    > Donna Brazille wasn't DNC chair until after the primaries were over, so how would she be an example of the DNC rigging the primaries for Clinton?
    - fleitz 10y ago
      Because she sent the emails to the Hillary Campaign. And then was surprise surprise, appointed to the DNC Chair. You know instead of the Hillary campaign saying, no no, you shouldn't appoint her, we have evidence that she is corrupt, here's the evidence. And then after the evidence came to light the DNC was like, oh that's fine.
      - lern_too_spel 10y ago
        Once again, how is that evidence of the DNC rigging the primaries for Clinton against Sanders? Do you admit that no such evidence exists?
        fleitz 10y ago
        No I don't, to me the emails and the resignations are both evidence and an admission of guilt, to you it might not be. I hope that Hillary and the DNC are able to get their day in court so the evidence can be heard by a jury of their peers rather than the court of public opinion.
        lern_too_spel 10y ago
        > To me the emails and the resignations are both evidence and an admission of guilt. Be specific. Which emails are evidence of guilt? None of the emails I've seen have shown any evidence of the DNC rigging the primaries. Why would the resignations be evidence of guilt if the stated reasons for resignation are just as plausible? Do you realize how much you sound like a conspiracy theorist?

Donna Brazille and DWS were respectively fired from CNN and resigned over the corruption.

by fleitz 10y ago

Donna Brazille and DWS were respectively fired from CNN and resigned over the corruption.

Donna Brazille wasn't DNC chair until after the primaries were over, so how would she be an example of the DNC rigging the primaries for Clinton? Wasserman-Schultz resigned to get out of the spotlight, which she believed would put more attention on Clinton for the general election. We have the DNC's full email history here. Surely if they rigged the primary for Clinton, there would be at least one email showing it.

astronautjones 10y ago
Donna Brazille was fired for leaking debate questions to the HRC campaign
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]
- lern_too_spel 10y ago
  > Donna Brazille wasn't DNC chair until after the primaries were over, so how would she be an example of the DNC rigging the primaries for Clinton?
  - fleitz 10y ago
    Because she sent the emails to the Hillary Campaign. And then was surprise surprise, appointed to the DNC Chair. You know instead of the Hillary campaign saying, no no, you shouldn't appoint her, we have evidence that she is corrupt, here's the evidence. And then after the evidence came to light the DNC was like, oh that's fine.
    - lern_too_spel 10y ago
      Once again, how is that evidence of the DNC rigging the primaries for Clinton against Sanders? Do you admit that no such evidence exists?
      - fleitz 10y ago
        No I don't, to me the emails and the resignations are both evidence and an admission of guilt, to you it might not be. I hope that Hillary and the DNC are able to get their day in court so the evidence can be heard by a jury of their peers rather than the court of public opinion.
        lern_too_spel 10y ago
        > To me the emails and the resignations are both evidence and an admission of guilt. Be specific. Which emails are evidence of guilt? None of the emails I've seen have shown any evidence of the DNC rigging the primaries. Why would the resignations be evidence of guilt if the stated reasons for resignation are just as plausible? Do you realize how much you sound like a conspiracy theorist?