5 ms·
FWIW, I submitted it because I found it intellecually engaging. I think there is a lesson here that's pertinent for hackers, being able to take a situation and
by CitizenKane 16y ago
FWIW, I submitted it because I found it intellecually engaging. I think there is a lesson here that's pertinent for hackers, being able to take a situation and look at in a unique way. Then taking that unique perspective and using it to your advantage.
But what I love about Derek's writing is that there always seems to be a lot of interesting nuggets of wisdom that they contain. I think there is a lot of interesting material here and that it could be taken a lot of different ways depending on the reader's perspective.
- rue 16y agoI did not find it in any way engaging. Embarrassing, rather. The "discussion" is not original, as was pointed out earlier, and rather poorly presented (granted the possible real protagonist may have been more charismatic.) On the other hand, if someone does find it useful or educational, I suppose the only fault can be found in myself for not having pointed to the same insight.
- ErrantX 16y agoWith the greatest respect; i'm not sure that everythign posted here has to be educational or useful. Sivers' writing is generally "inspirational" (I love his writing style), light hearted and informative. I actually think there is a very deep and important point to be learned from this particular post.
- rue 16y agoYou do not consider learning a "very deep and important point" to be educational nor useful? :) However you wish to refer to your experience, for one reason or another I did not share it but, as I was musing, that is sort of irrelevant since someone did.
- ErrantX 16y agoHmm, I was making a point regarding your comment and a weird mix of the original "not hacker news" one and your own. Sorry :( Formally: 1) I actually do think it is educational 2) Regardless, things posted to HN, surely, don't have to be educational all the time! :) To discuss your post a bit more: I think you missed the point. The subject of Sivers anecdote was irrelevant; as I read it (and the following explanation) it is about learning things :)