3 ms·
You are not addressing gp's points - that Maoist and "Modern China" are directly related and that "Modern China" is not "Euro style".
by parhurs 10y ago
You are not addressing gp's points - that Maoist and "Modern China" are directly related and that "Modern China" is not "Euro style".
- berntb 10y agoThe Chinese industrialization and growth was mostly based on capitalism. Which is more of a Western economy than the Great Leap. Which was the point you comment on. (At least, compared to the failure before, with just central planning.) If you have anything contradicting that, it would be interesting? (Edit: Ah, I commented on a karma 23 secondary account? :-) )
- parhurs 10y agoI don't have anything to contradict it, since I'm not arguing either way. I just like pointing out communication issues in HN's discussions. What about the second point?