2 ms·
It's literally the complete wrong way. You're inventing potential motivations, convincing yourself those are the motivations of the people involved, and then li
by etchalon 10y ago
It's literally the complete wrong way. You're inventing potential motivations, convincing yourself those are the motivations of the people involved, and then likely searching for evidence that proves your speculation correct.
- ZenoArrow 10y agoIt's not completely baseless, a former British ambassador that supposedly has close ties to WikiLeaks has suggested the information they leaked came from a DNC insider: https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/10/really-really-upset-foreign-office-security-services/ https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/10/really-reall... With that out of the way, let's return to the earlier question, in the situation I described previously, what would be gained by blaming a foreign group for the leaks?