The author seems to have neglected to put any link between Trump's election and a threat to software freedom within the article. Instead I see an appeal for don

The author seems to have neglected to put any link between Trump's election and a threat to software freedom within the article. Instead I see an appeal for donations I'm all for many of the aims listed in the article, but I find them tangential at best towards negative results of the election barring other evidence which was not presented. Diversity being under attack is about the only item which has any real validity in this list so far as I can tell. Even that isn't a direct attack on free software.