>Exactly, you have to tack on quite a few "provisos" in order to argue it's impossible. I wouldn't say it's strictly impossible. I would say the limit is envi

>Exactly, you have to tack on quite a few "provisos" in order to argue it's impossible. I wouldn't say it's strictly impossible. I would say the limit is environmental, rather than no limit existing. At a certain point, the available signals from the environment are as precise as they're going to get, the mind is as informed as it's going to get, and no further improvements are possible without a whole complicated raft of new experiences. Kinda like how science often hits the point where we can't actually shift into a new Kuhnian paradigm by pure deduction, but actually have to do expensive, difficult experiments.