3 ms·
Current implementation uses the local chrome storage api (chrome.storage.local). Could probably swap that out for the sync api (chrome.storage.sync). Haven't tr
by hharnisch 10y ago
Current implementation uses the local chrome storage api (chrome.storage.local). Could probably swap that out for the sync api (chrome.storage.sync). Haven't tried that yet though https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/storage#type-StorageArea https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/storage#type-Storage...
- bryanrasmussen 10y agoI guess it should do both (despite more complications), although I'm a FF guy so not the target.
- thecloud 10y agoswitching to sync storage is very easy as all api calls should be identical. just remember that the maximum size for stored objects is lower in sync storage (only 8mb I believe)