3 ms·
This report merely points the finger at Russia; it does not purport to substantiate that allegation. Previous JARs have not attributed malicious cyber activ
by x0x0 10y ago
This report merely points the finger at Russia; it does not purport to substantiate that allegation.
Previous JARs have not attributed malicious cyber activity to specific
countries or threat actors. However, public attribution of these activities
to RIS is supported by technical indicators from the U.S. Intelligence
Community, DHS, FBI, the private sector, and other entities.
The report then discusses when the attackers did and mitigation strategies.
- StanislavPetrov 10y ago>This report merely points the finger at Russia; it does not purport to substantiate that allegation. That's the point, its just another completely baseless, unsubstantiated accusation. This report contains nothing that suggests that the Russians were any more likely to be the source of the hack then countless other entities. The problem is that these baseless claims are being presented as evidence and being consumed uncritically as such. Take for example the headline in PcMag: >Hacking Evidence in Hand, Obama Sanctions Russia http://www.pcmag.com/news/350675/hacking-evidence-in-hand-obama-sanctions-russia http://www.pcmag.com/news/350675/hacking-evidence-in-hand-ob...
- x0x0 10y agoThis report doesn't claim to substantiate those allegations. It merely repeats them.
- marxmarv 10y agoBy the Big Lie theory, what's the diff?
- xapata 10y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov Are you trying to live up to the username or using it ironically?